Skip to content
The Turf Zone Logo The Turf Zone Logo
  • About
  • Associations
    • Alabama Turfgrass Association
    • Arkansas Turfgrass Association
    • Maryland Turfgrass Council
    • Mississippi Turfgrass Association
    • New England Sports Field Management Association
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
    • Tennessee Turfgrass Association
    • Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
    • Virginia Turfgrass Council
  • Publication Issues
    • Alabama Turf Times
    • Arkansas Turfgrass
    • Mississippi Turfgrass
    • MTC Turf News
    • New England Blade
    • North Carolina Turfgrass
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass
    • Tennessee Turfgrass
    • Virginia Turfgrass Journal
  • Podcasts
    • Alabama Turfgrass Association
    • Arkansas Turfgrass Association
    • Maryland Turfgrass Council
    • Mississippi Turfgrass Association
    • New England Sports Field Management Association
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
    • Tennessee Turfgrass Association
    • Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
    • Virginia Turfgrass Council
  • Events
    • Alabama Turfgrass Association
    • Arkansas Turfgrass Association
    • Maryland Turfgrass Council
    • Mississippi Turfgrass Association
    • New England Sports Field Management Association
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
    • Tennessee Turfgrass Association
    • Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
    • Virginia Turfgrass Council
  • Product Showcase
  • Contact
GO TO THE ATA WEBSITE
The Turf Zone Logo The Turf Zone Logo
  • About
  • Associations
    • Alabama Turfgrass Association
    • Arkansas Turfgrass Association
    • Maryland Turfgrass Council
    • Mississippi Turfgrass Association
    • New England Sports Field Management Association
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
    • Tennessee Turfgrass Association
    • Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
    • Virginia Turfgrass Council
  • Publication Issues
    • Alabama Turf Times
    • Arkansas Turfgrass
    • Mississippi Turfgrass
    • MTC Turf News
    • New England Blade
    • North Carolina Turfgrass
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass
    • Tennessee Turfgrass
    • Virginia Turfgrass Journal
  • Podcasts
    • Alabama Turfgrass Association
    • Arkansas Turfgrass Association
    • Maryland Turfgrass Council
    • Mississippi Turfgrass Association
    • New England Sports Field Management Association
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
    • Tennessee Turfgrass Association
    • Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
    • Virginia Turfgrass Council
  • Events
    • Alabama Turfgrass Association
    • Arkansas Turfgrass Association
    • Maryland Turfgrass Council
    • Mississippi Turfgrass Association
    • New England Sports Field Management Association
    • Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
    • Tennessee Turfgrass Association
    • Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
    • Virginia Turfgrass Council
  • Product Showcase
  • Contact

PODCAST

Share..

Alabama Turfgrass Association – When Bermudagrass Cultivars and Athletic Field Traffic Collide

November 18, 2021 | Alabama Turfgrass Association | PODCAST

PODCAST: PLAY IN NEW WINDOW | DOWNLOAD

Podcast (podcast_associations): Play in new window | Download (Duration: 9:39 — 13.3MB) | Embed

Subscribe Email | TuneIn | RSS

ATA Turf Times – Beth Guertal, Professor, Auburn University and Dave Han, Extension Specialist and Associate Professor, Alabama Extension and Auburn University

New bermudagrasses (both hybrid and improved vegetative selections of common bermudagrass) are being introduced into the turfgrass market, intended for use in athletic fields, home lawns, golf course fairways, and commercial landscaping. The grasses vary in their shade tolerance, resistance to various diseases, color, texture, and ability to tolerate traffic. For bermudgrasses used on athletic fields, traffic tolerance is one of the most important traits. So, in 2017, researchers at Auburn University installed a study to look at long-term traffic tolerance that evaluated six bermudagrass cultivars available commercially at the time under three levels of artificial traffic. This study evaluated the cultivars’ traffic tolerance when used as a typical high school athletic field.

In April of 2017 sod was laid from six different bermudagrass cultivars commonly used for southeastern US athletic fields. Cultivars were: Tifway, TifGrand, TifTuf, Latitude 36, NorthBridge (hybrid) and Celebration (vegetative common). The grasses were all obtained as sod cut from various commercial sod farms, and all sod was laid on the same day. Sod was laid in plots measuring 10 x 20 feet in size, with each main block of ‘cultivar’ replicated four times in a randomized complete block design.

Traffic was applied as strip plots across each cultivar (each traffic strip was 3 feet wide and 10 feet long), imposed using an artificial traffic simulator. Three levels of traffic were applied to the bermudagrasses: none, low (3 American style football games per week) or high (5 American style football games per week) foot traffic. The artificial traffic simulator is an aerification unit with the tines removed and replaced with strips of tire in which bolts are embedded. The traffic simulator is run up and down each plot, with the tires/bolts simulating foot wear and traffic. Traffic was applied during the typical US high school football season, from late August — November of each year (2017, 2018 and 2019). Figure 1 Plots were not overseeded in the winter, and in all other aspects (irrigation, fertilization, pest control) were managed as a higher-quality high school football field. Mowing height was 2 inches, done 3 times a week using a rotary mower, with clippings returned. Plots were not topdressed nor aerified from year to year.

Collected data included monthly color and quality using a relative 1 – 9 scale, with a score of ‘1’ for completely brown or dead turf, and a score of ‘9’ for lush, dark green turf. Additional data included shoot density, dry weight of roots, rhizomes and stolon, clipping yields, and spring density of Poa annua.

The results (to date) have shown that the cultivars do respond differently to different levels of traffic, but this mainly occurred in the fall, when the grasses were being actively trafficked. In the spring, the grasses had no traffic, and all of them tended to recover from the fall traffic, and differences in shoot density were only due to the cultivar itself. Table 1 shows shoot density of the various cultivars in the spring in various years, and only the highest level of traffic ever decreased shoot density. There were differences in cultivar, with TifGrand often having highest shoot density, and Celebration the lowest. In the fall, when traffic was being applied, Tifway and TifGrand were most affected by increasing levels of traffic, with shoot density decreasing from 5.6 to 3.4 shoots per square centimeter as traffic increased. In comparison, trafficked plots of NorthBridge and Celebration tended to not be as affected by traffic. Although their overall shoot density was often less, it did not reduce further when traffic was applied.

Table 1. Shoot density (shoots per square centimeter) of bermudagrass managed as an athletic field as affected by traffic level or cultivar. The interaction of cultivar and level of traffic was never significant for this data. Level of traffic none (NT), Low (LT) (3 American style football games per week) or High (HT) (5 American style football games per week).  Within each sampling date means followed by the same letter are not significantly from each other at an alpha of 0.05.

  Month/year of data collection
Cultivar April 2018 Aug 2019 June 2020
  shoots per square centimeter
Tifway 6.6 b 3.6 bc 4.7 b
TifGrand 8.9 a 5.2 a 5.6 a
TifTuf 6.5 b 4.1 abc 4.2 b
Latitude 36 5.8 b 4.8 ab 4.5 b
NorthBridge 8.0 a 3.9 bc 4.5 b
Celebration 3.3 c 3.4 c 3.1 c
 
Traffic Level
No traffic 6.5 a 4.6 a 4.6 a
Low Traffic 6.6 a 4.1 ab 4.3 a
High Traffic 6.4 a 3.8 b 4.3 a

 

The weight of stolons and rhizomes can be important, because that is a key plant part (above- and underground stems) that stores carbohydrates which are then used for turfgrass recovery, growth and spring greenup. Traffic never affected the dry weight of stolons and rhizomes, and the interaction between cultivar and traffic was also never significant (Table 2). Thus, all the differences in the dry weight of stolons/rhizomes was due to the cultivar. The bermudagrass cultivar with consistently the greatest dry weight of stolons and rhizomes was NorthBridge, while Tifway always had the lowest weight.

Table 2. Dry weight of stolons, rhizomes and roots of bermudagrass managed as an athletic field as affected by traffic level or cultivar. The interaction of cultivar and level of traffic was never significant. Level of traffic none (NT), Low (LT) (3 American style football games per week) or High (HT) (5 American style football games per week). Within each sampling date means followed by the same letter are not significantly from each other at an alpha of 0.05.

  Month/year
Cultivar July 2017 Sept 2018
  grams dry weight per two 2.5 inch diam. cores
Tifway 2.4 c 4.4 c
TifGrand 3.4 b 6.3 ab
TifTuf 3.4 b 5.3 bc
Latitude 36 2.9 bc 6.2 ab
NorthBridge 4.8 a 8.0 a
Celebration 2.6 bc 4.1 c
 
Traffic Level July 2017 Sept 2018
No traffic 3.2 a 5.5 a
Low Traffic 3.3 a 6.0 a
High Traffic 3.2 a 5.6 a

 

Regardless of the season, bermudagrass color and quality were more influenced by cultivar than level of traffic. Typically, Celebration and TifGrand were darker in color. When no traffic was applied, bermudagrass color typically had this ranking (from most to least green): TifGrand > Celebration > Tifway = TifTuf > Latitude 36 = NorthBridge. When plots were trafficked, it affected the color of Celebration, TifGrand and Tifway the most, with color decreasing as traffic increased. In comparison, as traffic increased, the color of Latitude 36, NorthBridge and TifTuf were largely unaffected by traffic. Cultivars with best quality (determined by lushness and uniformity of the turf) were often TifTuf, TifGrand and NorthBridge. This was regardless of the level of traffic.

The plots were sodded in the spring of 2017, and a winter annual preemergent herbicide was applied in the fall of that year. The following two years (2018 and 2019) no fall preemergent was applied, allowing evaluation of Poa annua infestation as affected by traffic and cultivar. In April of 2019 and 2020, any plot that was trafficked had greater populations of Poa annua (average of 25% cover in those plots) than in any plot that did not receive traffic (average of 10%). In 2019, plots containing Tifway or TifGrand had the largest Poa annua population, with NorthBridge joining that group in 2020. All other cultivars had similar populations of Poa annua, with a general population increase of 10 to 16% from 2019 to 2020.

It should be emphasized that none of the cultivars performed poorly over the four years of the study, and all had specific seasons when they performed better than others. Some cultivars had consistently darker color, while others had higher shoot density under extreme traffic. A few cultivars recovered quickly from the fall wear period, while others took a portion of the spring to recover from that wear (but all eventually did recover). This study will continue for two more years, allowing us to evaluate the long-term effects of traffic on bermudagrass cultivar performance.

READ THE ISSUE
RECENT NEWS

Mountain View Seeds Biennial Field Day

May 20, 2025 | ARTICLE

How to Measure Playability for Safe Sports Fields

May 12, 2025 | ARTICLE

The Status of Herbicide Resistant Weeds in Turfgrass Systems

May 11, 2025 | ARTICLE
SEE MORE
RECENT PODCASTS

The TurfZone Podcast: Dr. Becky Bowling on Industry Recruiting and UT’s First Beacon Event

09/03/2024 | Virginia Turfgrass Council

Alabama Turfgrass Association – A Contrarian’s Guide to Autonomous Turfgrass Robotic Technology

03/26/2024 | Alabama Turfgrass Association

Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council – Turfgrass Professionals Make Westinghouse Field of Dreams Come True

03/18/2024 | Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
SEE MORE
UPCOMING EVENTS
03
June
Tennessee Turfgrass Association
Turf Tuesdays – Multisport Management in Foxboro
Zoom
07
June
Alabama Turfgrass Association
North Alabama Native Plant Symposium
Huntsville, AL
09
June
Tennessee Turfgrass Association
TNGCSA Chapter – East June Meeting
Knoxville, TN
SEE MORE

The Turf Zone is your online destination for all things turf related. Created for the industry by those who know the industry, The Turf Zone is your central information and news hub, bringing together professionals from turf associations across multiple states to share things to help you in your business—from up-to-the-minute research on turfgrass products, to trends, initiatives and techniques. Each month, The Turf Zone will feature podcasts, articles, an events calendar, product spotlights and more. It’s everything you need, all just one click away. Get on-demand access to information that is driving sales, quality and growth across the industry.

Call today for THETURFZONE

Sponsorship Opportunities!

888.707.7141

Copyright © 2025 Leading Edge Communications, LLC | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

Be the first to know!

About the latest industry news, podcasts, events and more!

Keep me in the loop for the following associations:

Alabama Turfgrass Association
Arkansas Turfgrass Association
Maryland Turfgrass Council
Mississippi Turfgrass Association
New England Sports Turf Managers Association
Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council
Tennessee Turfgrass Association
Turfgrass Council of North Carolina
Virginia Turfgrass Council
No thanks, i'll stay in the dark Please don't display again
Your Hub For All Things Turf.
Subscribe
X